Some research might be conducted in a high-security laboratory in order to avoid ______.

Some research shows, however, that taking aspirin might make your cold last longer.(翻译)

A.I’d rather sit here if you don’t min

B.I think it might be a good idea to do some research first.

C.Certainly, why not？

D.Yes, I like these two places.

A．To tell people what a healthy diet actually is

B．To prove people's diets are increasingly unhealthy

C．To encourage people to cut down on processed food

D．To introduce some experts on the research team

A．To tell people what a healthy diet actually is

B．To prove people's diets are increasingly unhealthy

C．To encourage people to cut down on processed food

D．To introduce some experts in the research team

Directions: Translate the following into Chinese: (20 marks)

Mr. Graber believed, therefore, that it might be advisable to consider setting up some research into these inspection methods. Several important sales campaigns were about to be launched, and, in addition, it was hoped that a number of trade delegations visiting Switzerland in the near future would place large orders for office equipment with Schweibeur and its associates. So there was a need to reduce poor quality as soon as possible. (7marks)

Mr. Graber referred to a trip round the world that he would be making within the next twelve months. He would be visiting many Schweibeur associates and subsidiary companies and look forward to seeing all those present once again, in their own countries. (3 marks)

In the discussion that followed, Mr. Aguirre said that he had also had reports about poor quality in some items. He thought that research into this problem could be very beneficial, and considered that it would probably show that a majority of supervisors were not flexible enough in their methods. Mr. Fox agreed that there was a case for looking into the whole problem in detail, and confirmed that many inspection staff might be rather conservative in their methods. Perhaps because they tended to be older employees. Miss Lachenal agreed that this opinion was probably correct, and suggested some aspects of the problem that might be examined by the research team. Some detailed discussion of these followed. (10 marks)

SECTION C NEWS BROADCAST

Directions: In this section, you will hear several news items. Listen to them carefully and then answer the questions that follow.

听力原文： Cambridge University confirmed that talks are under way with Microsoft on the establishment of a research center, but they were "at a very preliminary stage". Industry sources say that recruitment has started for a research group of up to 100 people. Bill Gates, Microsoft’s founder, refuses to acknowledge the project existence.

What might eventually happen between Microsoft and Cambridge University？

A．To set up a joint research center.

B．To extend their cooperation.

C．To hire some researchers.

D．To complete the project.

SECTION C NEWS BROADCAST

Directions: In this section, you will hear several news items. Listen to them carefully and then answer the questions that follow.

听力原文： Cambridge University confirmed that talks are under way with Microsoft on the establishment of a research center, but they were "at a very preliminary stage". Industry sources say that recruitment has started for a research group of up to 100 people. Bill Gates, Microsoft’s founder, refuses to acknowledge the project existence.

What might eventually happen between Microsoft and Cambridge University？

A．To set up a joint research center.

B．To extend their cooperation.

C．To hire some researchers.

D．To complete the project.

political and social controversy in addition to legal restrictions. "It appears that controversy shapes what scientists choose to study and how they choose to study it, and we need to look a little bit more closely at the effects it might, be having," said Joanna Kempner, a researcher at the University of Michigan.

Kempner and coauthors from Brown University and the University of Pennsylvania conducted in-depth interviews with 41 scientists engaged in a variety of studies. They found that half felt con-strained by formal limits, but even more said they were affected by informal or unspoken rules on what and how studies can be done. Their findings are reported in Thursday's issue of the journal Science, in a paper entitled "Forbidden Knowledge." Formal limits include such things as the ban on federal funding for most research on embryonic stem cells and restrictions on research involving humans. In many cases, too, scientific journals have their own rules, such as refusing to publish material they think might be detrimental to national security.

But there also are fears about the ire of interest groups, such as opponents of animal testing, or about how a project would be perceived by the public. While formal and informal restrictions on re-search are not unusual, Deborah G. Johnson of the University of Virginia said they are not necessarily all bad. "On the one hand, you want a profession to have norms and to have some standards and some self-regulation. On the other hand, you don't want there to be an environment of fear of repercussions if they do something which they think is legitimate," said Johnson, who has studied similar issues but was not part of Kempner's group.

One researcher, commenting on avoiding controversial work, told Kempner's team: "I would like to lunatic-proof my life as much as possible." Militant animal rights groups were a concern for many, who worded about organizations that have invaded laboratories to set animals loose and destroy research. Kempner recalled one of her interviews. "All of a sudden he said, 'How do I know you're not from an animal rights organization collecting information to storm the place？'"

Sometimes commercial interests can get in the way of research, Kempner added, saying there are cases when the pharmaceutical industry will ask a researcher not to publish a particular finding.

According to the passage, why some scientists are thinking twice about doing or reporting their research？

A．Because they are lack of fund.

B．Because they have to share the honor with others.

C．Because their research may arouse Controversy.

D．Because the government bans them from publishing the results of their research.

between average and good negotiators. They found negotiators with the good trait record and studied them in action. They compared them with another group of average negotiators and found that there was no difference in the time that the two groups spent on planning their strategy. However, there were some significant differences on other points. The average negotiators thought in terms of the present, but the good negotiators took a long-time review. They made lots of suggestions and considered twice the number of the alternatives. The average negotiators set their objectives as single points. "We hope to get two dollars", for example. The good negotiators set their objective in terms of range, which they might formulate as "We hope to get two dollars, but if we get one dollar and fifty, it, will be all right." The average negotiators tried to persuade by giving lots of reasons. They use a lot of different arguments. The good negotiators didn't give many reasons. They just repeated the same ones. They also did more summarizing and reviewing, checking they were understood correctly.

What do good negotiators and average negotiators have in common？

A．Experience in negotiating.

B．A high level of intelligence.

C．The time they spend on preparation.

D．The amount of pay they receive.

e emphasis on a lively style, although, of course, there is no objection to writing that is pleasing and interesting. The primary goals of professional communication are accuracy, clarity, and completeness. The rough draft of any research report should be edited to ensure that all data is correctly presented, that all equipment is listed, that all results are properly detailed. As an aid to the reader, headings indicating at least the major sections of the report should be used, and all data should be presented under proper headings. In addition to their function of suggesting to the reader the contents of each section, headings enhance the formal appearance and professional quality of the report, increase to some degree the writer's credibility by reflecting a logical and methodical approach to the reporting process, and eliminate the need for wordy transitional devices between sections.

Research data should be presented in a way that places proper emphasis on major aspects of the project. For different readers different aspects will take on different degrees of importance, and some consideration should be given to structuring research reports differently for different audiences. Management, for example, will be most concerned with the results of a research project, and thus the results section should be emphasized, probably by presenting it immediately after the problem section and before the procedures section. Other researchers would be most interested in the procedure section, and this should be highlighted in writing up research projects for publication in professional journals or for presentation at professional conferences. For non-technical readers and federal agencies, the implications of the results might be the most important consideration, and emphasis should be placed on the discussion of the report for this readership.