重要提示: 请勿将账号共享给其他人使用,违者账号将被封禁!
查看《购买须知》>>>
找答案首页 > 全部分类 > 外语类考试
搜题
网友您好, 请在下方输入框内输入要搜索的题目:
搜题
题目内容 (请给出正确答案)
[主观题]

Questions are based on the following passage.A research led by the University of Sydney ha

Questions are based on the following passage.

A research led by the University of Sydney has found that people often think otherpeople are stating at them even when they aren"t. When in doubt, the human brain is morelikely to tell its owner that he"s under the gaze of another person.

"Gaze perception——the ability to tell what a person is looking at——is a social cue thatpeople ofen take for granted," says Professor Colin Clifford from the University"s Schoolof Psychology.

To tell if they"re under someone"s gaze, people look at the position of the otherperson"s eyes and the direction of their heads. These visual cues are then sent to the brainwhere there are specific areas that compute this information.

However, the brain doesn"t just passively receive information from the eyes. Thestudy shows that when people have limited visual cues, such as in dark conditions or whenthe other person is wearing sunglasses, the brain takes over with what it "knows".

The researchers created images of faces and asked people to observe where the faceswere looking. "We made it difficult for the observers to see where the eyes were pointedso they would have to rely on their prior knowledge to judge the faces" direction of gaze,"Professor Clifford explains. "It turns out that we"re likely to believe that others are staringat us, especially when we"re uncertain."

"There are several speculations to why humans have this bias," Professor Cliffordsays. "Direct gaze can signal dominance or a threat, and if you perceive something as athreat, you would not want to miss it. So assuming that the other person is looking at youmay simply be a safer strategy. Also, direct gaze is often a social cue that the other personwants to communicate with us, so it"s a signal for an upcoming interaction."

"It"s important that we find out whether it"s innate or learned——and how this mightaffect people with certain mental conditions," Professor Clifford says.

Research has shown, for example, that people who have autism (孤独症 ) are lessable to tell whether someone is looking at them. People with social anxiety, on the otherhand, have a higher tendency to think that they are under the stare of others.

"So if it is a learned behaviour, we could help them practice this task——onepossibility is letting them observe a lot of faces with different eyes and head directions,and giving them feedback on whether their observations are accurate."

What can we learn from the research led by the University of Sydney? 查看材料

A.Human brain can tell if its owner is under someone"s gaze.

B.Human brain cannot identify other people"s gaze when in doubt.

C.People in doubt often think they are stared at by others.

D.People tend to stare at others when they are in doubt.

查看答案
更多“Questions are based on the following passage.A research led by the University of Sydney ha”相关的问题

第1题

A recent study confirmed the interconnectivity of different species, which many havealways

known about. 查看材料

点击查看答案

第2题

The growing activity of marine megafauna accounts for an increasing population ofanchovy.

The growing activity of marine megafauna accounts for an increasing population ofanchovy.

查看材料

点击查看答案

第3题

During the last six months, there was a boom of sea creature in California and whalesare n

ot the only ones.

查看材料

点击查看答案

第4题

Soon after John Steinbeck described the booming sardine canning industry inCannery Row aro

und 1950s, the last time sardine crash occurred in the Pacific Ocean.

查看材料

点击查看答案

第5题

Every year, NOAA predicts the sardine population and sets fishing limits according toa sys

tem, which Oceana wants to change, believing it‘s too loose.

查看材料

点击查看答案

第6题

Scientists drew a conclusion that the population 9f sardine and anchovy change basedon a 5

0-year boom and bust cycle.

查看材料

点击查看答案

第7题

Compared with MBARI researchers, the Scripps researchers paid more attention tothe influen

ce of overfishing on sardine population.

查看材料

点击查看答案

第8题

Decades ago, Monterey was one of those declining cities; however, Monterey peoplestrived t

o make it a tourism city that will benefit their children for years.

查看材料

点击查看答案

第9题

Maybe it‘s the second time to give up relying on sardine and choose anchovy,Schmalz advise

d.

查看材料

点击查看答案

第10题

A. It has been an exceptionally good year for whale watching in California. In pastseasons

, sightseers off Monterey typically spotted two or three humpbacks (座头鲸 )on a single hftemoon at sea. This past September, October, November, and December,whale watchers was treated to more than 50 at a time. Dozens of killer whales playedin the same area throughout the fall. In December, a total of 364 gray whales werecounted migrating south past Palos Verdes——double the t 82 spotted there in December2012.

B. California has witnessed a genuine explosion of sea life over the past six months, andwhales aren"t the only ones making waves. Environmental scientists said in Decemberthat they were seeing "unprecedented" numbers of brown pelicans ( 鹈鹕 ) in theSan Francisco Bay Area. It"s been "a months-long carnival of humpback whales, birdclouds, dolphin wizardry, frenzied sea lions, playful killer whales and even visits frommarine royalty——blue whales," wrote the Santa Cruz Sentinel. To borrow a line fromMelville: Surely all this is not without meaning.

C.And meaning there is in this tale of Pacific ecology and American history. Theincreased activity of marine megafauna (句型动物 ) is being attributed to ananchovy ( 凤尾鱼 ) boom: The tiny fish have crowded the coast, densely packed,sparking an ongoing feeding frenzy. The flip side of the great anchovy upwelling,though, is the great sardine crash of 2013, which scientists expect to reboundthroughout the ecosystem for decades to come. Cetaceans ( 鲸目动物) , sea lions,and pelicans in Monterey may be feasting on anchovies now, but they"ll eventuallybe hurt by sardine scarcity, according to some biologists. An epidemic of sick sea lionpups in Southern California is already being blamed on the decline of sardines.

D.The last time Pacific sardines declined this steeply was around 1950, shortly afterJohn Steinbeck so exquisitely captured the prime of the sardine canning industry inhis novel Cannery Row.

E.Atlantic editor Corby Kummer described the fishery"s ups and downs, and itssignificance, in a 2007 article titled "The Rise of the Sardine." In the decades beforeSteinbeck wrote his novel, the sardine industry was feeding millions of soldiers inboth world wars and sustaining thousands of foreign-born workers——the canners andfishermen of Cannery Row——during the Great Depression. But the largest fisheryin the Western hemisphere began to mysteriously decline even while it was beingimmortalized in literature. By the mid-1950s, it had collapsed entirely.

F. The canneries shut down and Monterey started losing its smell. From 1967 to 1986there were severe restrictions on sardine fishing, and Cannery Row "turned into SkidRow," in Kummer"s words. Then it went to the tourists: an abandoned cannery wastransformed into the Monterey Bay Aquarium, a bronze bust of Steinbeck went up afew blocks away; now "Historic Cannery Row is Monterey"s premiere destination forgreat hotels, shopping, dining, family fun and nightlife."

G.The sardines came back after a couple of decades, and the stock climbed steadily intothe new millennium——hence Kummer"s argument, in 2007, that sardines were readyfor a culinary revival. But now the population has crashed again.

H.In the 1950s, the collapse of the sardine industry was blamed on overfishing. It"stempting to blame the current decline on global warming. Neither of those factorsdeserves single-handed responsibility, though. Oceanographers have known for alittle while, now, that there"s a natural ocean cycle——though, a long one that"s notfully understood——that governs the rise and fall of sardine and anchovy stocks in thePacific.

I.In 2003, scientists at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI)combed through decades of data on physical oceanography, marine biology, andmeteorology in the Pacific Ocean in search of long-term cycles governing sardineand anchovy populations. They concluded that sardine and anchovy stocks fluctuateaccording to a roughly 50-year "boom-and-bust" cycle. "A naturally occurring climatepattern that works its way across the Pacific," also known as the Pacific DecadalOscillation, brings warmer temperatures to the California coast approximately every25 years, prompting a switch-off between anchovies and sardines.

J.In 2013, researchers from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University ofCalifornia-San Diego even went deep into this cycle. Using data derived from variousmodels and simulations——including a previous study that reconstructed thousandsof years of sardine and anchovy population trends based on sedimentary seafloordeposits——they came up with what they believed to be an accurate reproductionof sardine-anchovy fluctuations from 1661 to 2013. This model "showed that thesardine and anchovy fluctuations were not controlled solely by climate, as had beenpreviously suggested," according to a write-up on Scripps"s Explorations Now site.The Scripps researchers gave more weight to the role of overfishing in sardine stocksthan the MBARI researchers did in 2003.

K.Both studies underscore the complexity of predicting the rise and fall of global fishpopulations. George Sugihara, another biologist at Scripps, thinks that all simulationsfisheries scientists use to predict populations and set quotas are "fundamentallyflawed." These models don"t reflect the "dynamic complexity" of the ocean, and can"taccount for how a population"s growth rate might vary in response to, for example,overfishing of another species or introductions of invasive species. His point isreinforced by a recent study, published in December 2013 in Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences, highlighting the "snowball effect" of overfishing andconfirming what many have always known about the interconnectedness of differentspecies.

L.In an excellent piece of reporting for the Monterey County Weekly, David Schmalzinterviewed representatives from various ocean conservation and fisheriesmanagement organizations about their conflicting opinions regarding the future ofsardines. NOAA uses a specific formula to project the sardine population and setcatch limits each year—a formula that the non-profit advocacy group Oceana wantsto change, arguing that it"s not restrictive enough. Some commercial fishermen inCalifornia, of course, think the formula is already too restrictive.

M. "When people think of sardines they think of Cannery Row, Steinbeck, theAquarium," wrote Schmalz. "When people think of anchovies, they think of pizzathat disgusts them." It may be time to let sardines go, a second time, and come toterms with anchovies, he suggests.

The last time sardines said "see you later" was a bitter goodbye. This time it isn"t, inpart because of the lessons we learned when they all but disappeared. One of thoselessons is simple: Do not rely on sardines for a paycheck, because they will abandonyou.

O. Another lesson: recovery. That the Monterey area was able to reinvent itself andbecome a world-class tourist destination in a matter of a decade is an incrediblefeat. All around the U.S., there are cities in decline that have been abandoned by theindustries that supported them. Monterey, years ago, was one of those cities, and thepeople that stayed on responded like prizefighters, establishing a sustainable industry(tourism) that will carry on for generations.

P. But the most important lesson their disappearance taught us——and one we arecertainly still leaming——is respect for the sea, and the balance of its ecosystems.When the fishery began, and truly thrived, there were so many fish in the sea it washard for anyone to imagine they could be exhausted.

Though without total understanding, scientists have known there is a natural oceancycle that controls the population changing of sardine and anchovy in the Pacific. 查看材料

点击查看答案
下载上学吧APP
客服
TOP
重置密码
账号:
旧密码:
新密码:
确认密码:
确认修改
购买搜题卡查看答案
购买前请仔细阅读《购买须知》
请选择支付方式
微信支付
支付宝支付
选择优惠券
优惠券
请选择
点击支付即表示你同意并接受《服务协议》《购买须知》
立即支付
搜题卡使用说明

1. 搜题次数扣减规则:

功能 扣减规则
基础费
(查看答案)
加收费
(AI功能)
文字搜题、查看答案 1/每题 0/每次
语音搜题、查看答案 1/每题 2/每次
单题拍照识别、查看答案 1/每题 2/每次
整页拍照识别、查看答案 1/每题 5/每次

备注:网站、APP、小程序均支持文字搜题、查看答案;语音搜题、单题拍照识别、整页拍照识别仅APP、小程序支持。

2. 使用语音搜索、拍照搜索等AI功能需安装APP(或打开微信小程序)。

3. 搜题卡过期将作废,不支持退款,请在有效期内使用完毕。

请使用微信扫码支付(元)
订单号:
遇到问题请联系在线客服
请不要关闭本页面,支付完成后请点击【支付完成】按钮
遇到问题请联系在线客服
恭喜您,购买搜题卡成功 系统为您生成的账号密码如下:
重要提示: 请勿将账号共享给其他人使用,违者账号将被封禁。
发送账号到微信 保存账号查看答案
怕账号密码记不住?建议关注微信公众号绑定微信,开通微信扫码登录功能
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险

为了保护您的账号安全,请在“上学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!

- 微信扫码关注上学吧 -
警告:系统检测到您的账号存在安全风险
抱歉,您的账号因涉嫌违反上学吧购买须知被冻结。您可在“上学吧”微信公众号中的“官网服务”-“账号解封申请”申请解封,或联系客服
- 微信扫码关注上学吧 -
请用微信扫码测试
选择优惠券
确认选择
谢谢您的反馈

您认为本题答案有误,我们将认真、仔细核查,如果您知道正确答案,欢迎您来纠错

上学吧找答案