银监会对银行业的监管措施中，市场准入不包括（)准入。A．信息B．机构C．业务D．高级管理人员

根据下面材料，回答{TSE}题.{TS} One benefit of the long trial was that

A. McDonald's become more famous after that.

B. people knew a lot about the food processing in McDonald's.

C. the way McDonald's treated its workers has been improved,

D. the government got a sum of money from it.

Do-it-Yourself has become one of Mr Miller's hobbies.

A．Right

B．Wrong

Do-it-Yourself has become one of Mr. Miller's hobbies.

A．True

B．Fasle

h Bend is given by Q = 200 Q hamburgers. If a second McDonald’s franchise were to move into North Bend (and both behave as duopolists), the profit of the original McDonald’s would.

A、fall from $10 to $ -80

B、fall from $210 to $120.

C、fall from $90 to $ -80

D、fall from $10 to $ -40

taurant in California in the late 1940s. It's one of the two most recognized and powerful brands in the world, the other being Coca-Cola, the only soft drink supplier to McDonald's today.

QSCV has been the foundation that built McDonald's success. QSCV stands for the McDonald's principles of Quality, Service, Cleanliness and Value. It's McDonald's business philosophy ever since it came into being. Quality to McDonald's means that they ensure their customers receive food products that are the result of the best ingredients, strict standards and proven preparation procedures so that they will be safe, healthy and great-tasting.

Service that's fast and friendly has always been a foundation for success of McDonald's. They provide service that meets and exceeds their customer's expectations.

Cleanliness has always been McDonald's principle. This means having the cleanest and freshest facilities—from the kitchen and dining room to the rest rooms and parking lots.

Value means low prices at McDonald's. Today, value is defined as the total experience you receive for what you pay. The total experience includes nice food, friendly folks, a clean environment, quick and accurate service—and fun.

When was McDonald's founded？

A．In the early 1950s.

B．In the late 1940s.

C．In the late 1950s.

D．In the early 1940s.

st fast—food chain, against two penniless environment campaigners.

In 1997, the High Court in London found that environmental campaigners Helen Steel, aged 34, and Dave Morris, 44, were guilty of distributing a pamphlet containing allegations against McDonald’s and their fast food and its preparation. The trial lasted three years and brought to light much evidence about the way McDonald’s hamburger chain workers prepared, handled and served food, and the treatment of these workers by the American-owned company. The High Court in London awarded McDonald’s damages of 60,000 pounds (RMB 780,000) against the two penniless campaigners.

But in 1999, three Appeal Court Judges in London decided that the two defendants found guilty of libel against McDonald’s in 1997 would have the damages they have to pay to McDonald’s reduced to 40,000 pounds (RMB 520,000).

While upholding the libel ruling, the judges backed the defendants' claim the food carries health risks and said allegations McDonald’s workers suffer poor pay and conditions are "fair comment". The judges also backed a claim by the defendants that eating the company’s hamburgers can cause heart disease.

The claim that "if one eats enough McDonald’s food, one’s diet may well become high in fat..., with the very real risk of heart disease, is justified," said Lord Justice Pill, who was sitting in the Court of Appeal with Lord Justice May and Justice Keene.

The appeal decision is likely to be a further embarrassment to McDonald’s, whose three-year action against environmental campaigners Helen Steel and Dave Morris generated extensive negative publicity.

Peter Backman, chief executive of Food Service Intelligence, a research group, said: " McDonald’s is very conscious of what people say about them. They have got where they have by listening to consumers. I think their strategy will be to downplay the ruling, refute the comments, and thirdly, to do something about it." McDonald’s said it welcomed the Court of Appeal decision to uphold the 1997 libel ruling.

The company faces another $200,000 legal bill for the 23-day appeal hearing. Steel and Morris were to take the case to the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights to appeal against the damages awarded against them. They present much of their cases themselves and any lawyer’s fees are largely paid for by donations. The pair have yet to win court backing for claims that McDonald’s damages the environment, or that there are links between its hamburgers, cancer and food poisoning.

The fast-food chain has not yet recovered a penny of its original libel award from the defendants, who are refusing to hand over any money.

One benefit of the long trial was that

A．McDonald’s become more famous after that.

B．people knew a lot about the food processing in McDonald’s.

C．the way McDonald’s treated its workers has been improved.

D．the government got a sum of money from it.

How does Elizabeth's company differ from Steven's？

A．It is likely to become larger than Steven's in the future.

B．It has started to operate in more then one country.

C．It has started to operate in more than one country.

Why is McDonald’s not satisfied with the result of 19997

A．Because it has to face another $200,000 legal bill.

B．Because it was wrongly treated by the Appeal Court Judges.

C．Because the result will make McDonald’s further lose face.

D．Because the Court announced the two defendants innocent of libel.