¿Cuál de las siguientes obras no es de Ana María Matute？

Le plus grand plaisir de la journée Le matin, à huit heures, la famille Blond prend le petit déjeuner. Monsieur et Madame Blond prennent du café et leurs enfants boivent du lait. Ils mangent du pain avec du beurre（黄油） ou de la confiture（果酱）. Ils prennent leur repas dans la salle à manger. Après le petit déjeuner, les parents vont au bureau à huit heures et demie, les enfants vont à l’école à la même heure. A midi, les parents déjeunent au restaurant de l’entreprise（企业）. Monsieur Blond aime le riz et le poisson. Mme Blond prend souvent de la viande. Les enfants déjeunent à l’école. Ils prennent beaucoup de légumes, mais jamais de poisson, parce qu’ils n’aiment pas le poisson. Comme dessert, il y a des gateaux au chocolat et des fruits. Le soir, toute la famille d?nent ensemble. Les parents boivent du vin blanc ou du vin rouge（红葡萄酒）. Ils passent beaucoup de temps à table. Ils parlent de leur travail, de leurs amis, de leurs chiens et de toutes les choses intéressantes de la jour-née. Pour eux, le d?ner en famille est souvent le plus grand plaisir de la journée. Question 2 à midi, où est-ce que la famille Blond déjeune ?

A、Les parents déjeunent au restaurant de l’entreprise, les enfants à l’école.

B、Les parents déjeunent à la maison, les enfants à l’école.

C、Les parents déjeunent au restaurant de l’entreprise, les enfants à la maison.

D、Tout le monde déjeune à la maison.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision Monday to let stand a ruling in an online defamation case will make it more difficult to determine correct legal jurisdictions in other Internet cases, legal experts said.

By opting not to take the case, the high court effectively endorsed a lower court's decision that a Colorado company that posts ratings of health plans on the Internet could be sued for defamation in a Washington court. The lower court ruling is one of several that makes it easier for plaintiffs to sue Web site operators in their own jurisdictions, rather than where the operators maintain a physical presence.

The case involved a defamation suit filed by Chehalis, Wash. -based Northwest Healthcare Alliance against Lakewood, Colo. based Healthgrades.com. The Alliance sued in Washington federal court after Healthgrades.com posted a negative ranking of Northwest Healthcares home health services on the Internet. Healthgrades.com argued that it should not be subject to the jurisdiction of a court in Washington because its publishing operation is in Colorado.

Observers said the fact that the Supreme Court opted not to hear the case only clouds the legal situation for Web site operators.

Geoff Stewart, a partner at Jones Day in Washington, D.C., said that the Supreme Court eventually must act on the issue, as Internet sites that rate everything from automobile dealerships to credit offers could scale back their 9fferings to avoid lawsuits originating numerous jurisdictions.

Online publishers also might have to worry about being dragged into lawsuits in foreign courts, said Dow Lohnes & Albertson attorney Jon Hart, who has represented the Online News Association.

"The much more difficult problems for U.S. media companies arise when claims are brought in foreign countries over content published in the United States," Hart said. Hart cited a recent case in which an Australian court ruled that Dow Jones must appear in a Victoria, Australia court to defend its publication of an article on the U.S.-based Wall Street Journal Web site.

According to Hart, the potential chilling effect of those sorts of jurisdictional decisions is substantial. "I have not yet seen publishers holding back on what they otherwise publish because they're afraid they're going to get sued in another country, but that doesn't mean it won't happen if we see a rash of U.S. libel cases against U.S. media companies being brought in foreign countries," he said.

Until the high court decides to weigh in directly on this issue, Web site operators that offer information and services to users located outside of their home states must deal with a thorny legal landscape, said John Morgan, a partner at Perkins Coie LLP and an expert in Internet law.

The author seems to believe that the Supreme Court's decision______.

A．puts Web site operators at a legal disadvantage

B．renders correct legal decisions in other cases impossible

C．brings about a series of incorrect legal rulings

D．causes operators to issue balanced health plans

The U.S, Supreme Court's decision Monday to let stand a ruling in an online defamation case will make it more difficult to determine correct legal jurisdictions in other Internet cases, legal experts said.

By opting not to take the case, the high court effectively endorsed a lower court's decision that a Colorado company that posts ratings of health plans on the Internet could be sued for defamation in a Washington court. The lower court ruling is one of several that makes it easier for plaintiffs to sue Web site operators in their own jurisdictions, rather than where the operators maintain a physical presence.

The case involved a defamation suit filed by Chehalis, Wash.-based Northwest Healthcare Alliance against Lakewood, Colo.-based Healthgrades.com. The Alliance sued in Washington federal, court after Healthgrades.com posted a negative ranking of Northwest Healthcare's home health services on the Internet. Healthgrades.com argued that it should not be subject to the jurisdiction of a court in Washington because its publishing operation is in Colorado.

Observers said the fact that the Supreme Court opted not to hear the case only clouds the legal situation for Web site operators.

Geoff Stewart, a partner at Jones Day in Washington, D.C., said that the Supreme Court eventually must act on the issue, as Internet sites that rate everything from automobile dealerships to credit offers could scale back their offerings to avoid lawsuits originating numerous jurisdictions.

Online publishers also might have to worry about being dragged into lawsuits in foreign courts, said Dow Lohnes & Albertson attorney Jon Hart, who has represented the Online News Association.

"The much more difficult problems for U.S. media companies arise when claims are brought in foreign countries over content published in the United States", Hart said. Hart cited a recent case in which an Australian court ruled that Dow Jones must appear in a Victoria, Australia court to defend its publication of all article on the U.S.-based Wall Street Journal Web site.

According to Hart, the potential chilling effect of those sorts of jurisdictional decisions is substantial. "I have not yet seen publishers holding back on what they otherwise publish because they're afraid they're going to get sued in another country, but that doesn't mean it won't happen if we see a rash of U.S. libel cases against U.S. media companies being brought in foreign countries", he said.

Until the high court decides to weigh in directly on this issue, Web site operators that offer information and services to users located outside of their home states must deal with a thorny legal landscape, said John Morgan, a partner at Perkins Cole LLP and an expert in Internet law.

The author seems to believe that the Supreme Court's decision ______.

A．puts Web site operators at a legal disadvantage

B．renders correct legal decisions in other cases impossible

C．brings about a series of incorrect legal rulings

D．causes operators to issue balanced health plans

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision Monday to let stand a ruling in an online defamation case will make it more difficult to determine correct legal jurisdictions in other Internet eases, legal experts said.

By opting not to take the case, the high court effectively endorsed a lower court's decision that a Colorado company that posts ratings of health plans on the Internet could be sued for defamation in a Washington court. The lower court ruling is one of several that makes it easier for plaintiffs to sue Web site operators in their own jurisdictions, rather than where the operators maintain a physical presence.

The case involved a defamation suit filed by Chehalis, Wash-based Northwest Healthcare Alliance against Lakewood, Colo-based Healthgrades.com. The Alliance sued in Washington federal court after Healthgrades.com posted a negative ranking of Northwest Healthcare's home health services on the Internet. Healthgrades.com argued that it should not be subject to the jurisdiction of a court in Washington because its publishing operation is in Colorado.

Observers said the fact that the Supreme Court opted not to hear the case only clouds the legal situation for Web site operators.

Geoff Stewart, a partner at Jones Day in Washington, D.C., said that the Supreme Court eventually must act on the issue, as Internet sites that rate everything from automobile dealerships to credit offers could scale back their offerings to avoid lawsuits originating numerous jurisdictions.

Online publishers also might have to worry about being dragged into lawsuits in foreign courts, said Dow Lohnes ＆ Albertson attorney Jon Hart, who has represented the Online News Association.

"The much more difficult problems for U.S. media companies arise when claims are brought in foreign countries over content published in the United States", Hart said. Hart cited a recent case in which an Australian court ruled that Dow Jones must appear in a Victoria, Australia court to defend its publication of an article on the U.S.-based Watt Street Journal Web site.

According to Hart, the potential chilling effect of those sorts of jurisdictional decisions is substantial. "I have not yet seen publishers holding back on what they otherwise publish because they're afraid they're going to get sued in another country, but that doesn't mean it Won't happen if we see a rash of U.S. libel cases against U.S. media companies being brought in foreign countries", he said.

Until the high court decides to weigh in directly on this issue, Web site operators that offer information and services to users located outside of their home states must deal with a thorny legal landscape, said John Morgan, a partner at Perkins Coie LLP and an expert in Internet law.

The author seems to believe that the Supreme Court's decision

A．can cause operators to issue balanced health plan ratings.

B．renders correct legal decisions in other cases impossible.

C．might put Web site operators at a legal disadvantage.

D．brings about a series of debates on Internet operations.

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision Monday to let stand a ruling in an online defamation case will make it more difficult to determine correct legal jurisdictions in other Internet cases, legal experts said.

By opting not to take the case, the high court effectively endorsed a lower court's decision that a Colorado company that posts ratings of health plans on the Internet could be sued for defamation in a Washington court. The lower court ruling is one of several that makes it easier for plaintiffs to sue Web site operators in their own jurisdictions, rather than where the operators maintain a physical presence.

The case involved a defamation suit filed by Chehalis, Wash.-based Northwest Healthcare Alliance against Lakewood, Colo.-based Healthgrades.com The Alliance sued in Washington federal court after Healthgrades.com posted a negative ranking of Northwest Healthcare's home health services on the Internet. Healthgrades.com argued that it should not be subject to the jurisdiction of a court in Washington because its publishing operation is in Colorado.

Observers said the fact that the Supreme Court opted not to hear the case only clouds the legal situation for Web site operators.

Geoff Stewart, a partner at Jones Day in Washington, D.C., said that the Supreme Court eventually must act on the issue, as Internet sites that rate everything from automobile dealerships to credit offers could scale back their offerings to avoid lawsuits originating numerous jurisdictions.

Online publishers also might have to worry about being dragged into lawsuits in foreign courts, said Dow Lohnes & Albertson attorney Jon Hart, who has represented the Online News Association.

"The much more difficult problems for U.S. media companies arise when claims are brought in foreign countries over content published in the United States", Hart said. Hart cited a recent case in which an Australian court ruled that Dow Jones must appear in a Victoria, Australia court to defend its publication of an article on the U.S.—based Walt Street Journal Web site.

According to Hart, the potential chilling effect of those sorts of jurisdictional decisions is substantial. "I have not yet seen publishers holding back on what they otherwise publish because they're afraid they're going to get sued in another country, but that doesn't mean it won't happen if we see a rash of U.S. libel cases against U.S. media companies being brought in foreign countries", he said.

Until the high court decides to weigh in directly on this issue, Web site operators that offer information and services to users located outside of their home states must deal with a thorny legal landscape, said John Morgan, a partner at Perkins Coie LLP and an expert in Internet law.

The author seems to believe that the Supreme Court's decision ______.

A．can cause operators to issue balanced health plan ratings.

B．renders correct legal decisions in other cases impossible.

C．might put Web site operators at a legal disadvantage.

D．brings about a series of debates on Internet operations.

Observe that for the programmer，as for the chef,the urgency of the patron(顾客) may govern the scheduled completion of the task，but it cannot govern the actual completion．An omelette(煎鸡蛋)，promised in two minutes，may appear to be progressing nicely．But when it has not set in two minutes，the customer has two choices—waits or eats it raw．Software customers have had (71) choices．

Now I do not think software (72) have less inherent courage and firmness than chefs，nor than other engineering managers．But false (73) to match the patron's desired date is much more common in our discipline than elsewhere in engineering．It is very (74) to make a vigorous，plausible，and job risking defense of an estimate that is derived by no quantitative method，supported by little data，and certified chiefly by the hunches of the managers．

Clearly two solutions are needed．We need to develop and publicize productivity figures，bug-incidence figures，estimating rules，and so on．The whole profession can only profit from (75) such data．Until estimating is on a sounder basis，individual managers will need to stiffen their backbones and defend their estimates with the assurance that their poor hunches are better than wish derived estimates．

（71）

A．no

B．the same

C．other

D．lots of

● Observe that for the programmer, as for the chef, the urgency of the patron（顾客） may govern the scheduled completion of the task, but it cannot govern the actual completion.

An omelette（煎鸡蛋）, promised in two minutes, may appear to be progressing nicely. But when it has not set in two minutes, the customer has two choices—waits or eats it raw.

Software customers have had （71） choices.

Now I do not think software （72） have less inherent courage and firmness thanchefs, nor than other engineering managers. But false （73） to match the patron's desired date is much more common in our discipline than elsewhere in engineering. It is very（74）to make a vigorous, plausible, and job risking defense of an estimate that is derived by no quantitative method, supported by little data, and certified chiefly by the hunches of the managers.

Clearly two solutions are needed. We need to develop and publicize productivity figures, bug-incidence figures, estimating rules, and so on. The whole profession can only profit from （75） such data. Until estimating is on a sounder basis, individual managers will need to stiffen their backbones and defend their estimates with the assurance that their poor hunches are better than wish derived estimates.

（71）

A. no

B. the same

C. other

D. lots of

（72）

A.testers

B. constructors

C. managers

D. architects

（73）

A. tasks

B. jobs

C. works

D. scheduling

（74）

A. easy

B. difficult

C. simple

D. painless

（75）A. sharing B. excluding C. omitting D. ignoring

● Observe that for the programmer, as for the chef, the urgency of the patron（顾客） may govern the scheduled completion of the task, but it cannot govern the actual completion.

An omelette（煎鸡蛋）, promised in two minutes, may appear to be progressing nicely. But when it has not set in two minutes, the customer has two choices—waits or eats it raw.

Software customers have had （71） choices.

Now I do not think software （72） have less inherent courage and firmness thanchefs, nor than other engineering managers. But false （73） to match the patron's desired date is much more common in our discipline than elsewhere in engineering. It is very（74）to make a vigorous, plausible, and job risking defense of an estimate that is derived by no quantitative method, supported by little data, and certified chiefly by the hunches of the managers.

Clearly two solutions are needed. We need to develop and publicize productivity figures, bug-incidence figures, estimating rules, and so on. The whole profession can only profit from （75） such data. Until estimating is on a sounder basis, individual managers will need to stiffen their backbones and defend their estimates with the assurance that their poor hunches are better than wish derived estimates.

（71）

A. no

B. the same

C. other

D. lots of

（72）

A.testers

B. constructors

C. managers

D. architects

（73）

A. tasks

B. jobs

C. works

D. scheduling

（74）

A. easy

B. difficult

C. simple

D. painless

（75）A. sharing B. excluding C. omitting D. ignoring

● Observe that for the programmer, as for the chef, the urgency of the patron （顾客）may govern the scheduled completion of the task, but it cannot govern the actual completion. An omelette（煎鸡蛋）, promised in two minutes, may appear to be progressing nicely. But when it has not set in two minutes, the customer has two choices—waits or eats it raw. Software customers have had （71） choices.

Now I do not think software （72） have less inherent courage and firmness than chefs, nor than other engineering managers. But false （73） to match the patron's desired date is much more common in our discipline than elsewhere in engineering. It is very （74） to make a vigorous, plausible, and job risking defense of an estimate that is derived by no quantitative method, supported by little data, and certified chiefly by the hunches of the managers.

Clearly two solutions are needed. We need to develop and publicize productivity figures, bug-incidence figures, estimating rules, and so on. The whole profession can only profit from （75） such data. Until estimating is on a sounder basis, individual managers will need to stiffen their backbones and defend their estimates with the assurance that their poor hunches are better than wish derived estimates.

（71）

A. no B. the same

C. other D. lots of

（72）

A.testers B. constructors

C. managers D. architects

（73）

A. tasks B. jobs

C. works D. scheduling

（74）

A. easy B. difficult

C. simple D. painless

（75）

A. sharing B. excluding

C. omitting D. ignoring

● Observe that for the programmer, as for the chef, the urgency of the patron（顾客） may govern the scheduled completion of the task, but it cannot govern the actual completion. An omelette（煎鸡蛋）, promised in two minutes, may appear to be progressing nicely. But when it has not set in two minutes, the customer has two choices—waits or eats it raw. Software customers have had （71） choices.

Now I do not think software （72） have less inherent courage and firmness than chefs, nor than other engineering managers. But false （73） to match the patron's desired date is much more common in our discipline than elsewhere in engineering. It is very （74） to make a vigorous, plausible, and job risking defense of an estimate that is derived by no quantitative method, supported by little data, and certified chiefly by the hunches of the managers.

Clearly two solutions are needed. We need to develop and publicize productivity figures, bug-incidence figures, estimating rules, and so on. The whole profession can only profit from （75） such data. Until estimating is on a sounder basis, individual managers will need to stiffen their backbones and defend their estimates with the assurance that their poor hunches are better than wish derived estimates.

（71）

A. no

B. the same

C. other

D. lots of

（72）

A. testers

B. constructors

C. managers

D. architects

（73）

A. tasks

B. jobs

C. works

D. scheduling

（74）

A. easy

B. difficult

C. simple

D. painless

（75）

A. sharing

B. excluding

C. omitting

D. ignoring