Both the merchant and his daughter were horrified. So the cunning money-lender proposed they let chance decide the matter. He told them he would put a black pebble and a white pebble into an empty money-bag and then the girl would have to pick out of the pebbles. If she chose the black pebble, she would become his wife and her father's debt would be cancelled. If she chose the white one, she would stay with her father and the debt would be cancelled. But if she refuses to pick out a pebble, her father would be thrown into jail.
Reluctantly the merchant agreed. They were standing on a pebble-strewn path as they talked and the money-lender stooped to pick up the two pebbles. The girl, sharp-eyed with fright, noticed that he picked up two black pebbles and put them into the money-bag.
What would you do if you were the unfortunate girl? If you had to advise her what would you advise her to do?
What type of thinking would you use to solve the problem? You may believe that careful logical analysis must solve the problem if there is a solution. This type of thinking is straight-forward vertical thinking. The other type of thinking is lateral thinking.
Vertical thinkers are not usually of much help to a girl in this situation. The way they analyze it, there are three possibilities:
1. The gift should refuse to take a pebble.
2. The girl should show that there are two black pebbles in the bag and expose the money-lender as a cheat.
3. The girl should take a black pebble and sacrifice herself to save her father from prison.
None of these suggestions is very helpful, for if the girl doesn't take a pebble her father goes to prison, and if she does take a pebble, she has to marry the money-lender.
The girl in the story put her hand into the bag and took out a pebble. Without looking she fumbled and let it fall to the path and immediately, it lost among the others. The girl apologized for her clumsiness and suggested that the money-lender look at the remaining pebble in the bag and then they could tell the color of the pebble she has chosen. And the money lender dare not admit his dishonesty. The girl had changed an impossible situation into an extremely advantageous one.
This story shows the difference between vertical thinking and lateral thinking. Vertical thinkers take very reasonable view of a situation and proceed logically and carefully worked it out. Lateral thinkers tend to explore all the different ways of looking at something, rather than accepting the most promising and proceeding from that.
The author begins this article with ______.
A.an amusing anecdote
B.a well-known fable
C.an illustrative story
D.an enlightening folk-tale
第1题
女,67岁;右手抖动,动作缓慢4年,考虑为帕金森病,体检时最不可能出现的症状是
A.右上肢肌张力减低
B.右上肢静止性震颤
C.面部表情刻板
D.行走时步距变小
E.行走时右上肢连带动作消失
第2题
女,67岁,右手抖动,动作缓慢,考虑为帕金森病,体检时下列最不可能出现的体征是
A.右上肢肌张力增高
B.右上下肢反射亢进
C.面部表情刻板
D.行走时步距变小
E.行走时右上肢连带动作消失
第3题
患者,女,67岁,右手抖动,动作缓慢,已4年,考虑为帕金森病,体检时最不可能出现的体征是
A、右上肢肌张力减低
B、右上下肢静止性震颤
C、行走时步距变小
D、面部表情刻板
E、行走时右上肢联带动作消失
第4题
患者,女,67岁,右手抖动,动作缓慢,已4年,考虑为帕金森病,体检时最不可能出现的体征是
A、右上肢肌张力减低
B、右上下肢静止性震颤
C、面部表情刻板
D、行走时步距变小
E、行走时右上肢联带动作消失
第5题
患者,女,67岁,右手抖动,动作缓慢,已4年,考虑为帕金森病,体检时最不可能出现的体征是
A、右上肢肌张力减低
B、右上下肢静止性震颤
C、面部表情刻板
D、行走时步距变小
E、行走时右上肢联带动作消失
第6题
A、行走时右上肢联带动作消失
B、右上下肢静止性震颤
C、面部表情刻板
D、行走时步距变小
E、右上肢肌张力减低
第8题
男,65岁,近2年来右上肢抖动,动作迟缓面容呆板,行走起步困难,体检右上下肢肌张力齿轮样增高。
该患者发病机制可能是
A.黑质左旋酪氨酸羟化酶减少
B.纹状体内乙酰胆碱含量增加,使多巴胺含量减少
C.纹状体内多巴胺受体敏感性增高
D.黑质多巴胺脱羧酶增多
E.黑质单胺氧化酶减少
为了保护您的账号安全,请在“上学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!