Each member state itself in this international organisation has less competitive edge.

main All network servers run Windows Server 2003.A member server named TestKingSrv1 functions as the backup server. Every night, TestKingSrv1 performs a normal backup of all files on drive D:\ of all servers in the domain. Files are stored on magnetic tape.A new written company security policy states that all servers must be protected from registry corruption.You need to ensure that a current copy of the registry from every server on the network is automatically backed up daily on magnetic tape.What should you do？（）

A. On TestKingSrv1, create a new backup job that runs every day. Configure the job to back up drive C:\ on every network server.

B. On TestKingSrv1, select Options, and then select the Exclusions tab. Remove all exclusions for files of the Registry Writer application type.

C. On each network server, start Registry Editor. On the File menu, select Export. Specify All as the export range. Export the registry to drive D:\.

D. On each network server, configure a new backup job that runs every day. Configure the job to back up each server‘s System State data in a file on drive D:\.

Section B

Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A, B, C and D. You should decide on the best choice.

When we worry about who might be spying on our private lives, we usually think about the Federal agents. But the private sector outdoes the government every time. It's Linda Tripp, not the FBI, who is facing charges under Maryland's laws against secret telephone taping. It's our banks not the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), that pass our private financial data to telemarketing firms.

Consumer activists are pressing Congress for better privacy laws without much result so far. The legislators lean toward letting business people track our financial habits virtually at will.

As an example of what's going on, consider U.S. Bancorp, which was recently sued for deceptive practices by the state of Minnesota. According to the lawsuit, the bank supplied a telemarketer called Member Works with sensitive customer data such as names, phone numbers, bank-account and credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, account balances and credit limits.

With these customer lists in hand, Member Works started dialing for dollars-selling dental plans, videogames, computer software and other products and services. Customers who accepted a "free trial offer" had 30 days to cancel. If the deadline passed, they were charged automatically through their bank or credit card accounts. U.S. Bancorp collected a share of the revenues.

Customers were doubly deceived, the lawsuit claims. They didn't know that the bank was giving account numbers to Member Works. And if customers asked, they were led to think the answer was no.

The state sued Member Works separately for deceptive selling. The Company denies that it did anything wrong. For its part, U.S. Bancorp settled without admitting any mistakes. But it agreed to stop exposing its customers to nonfinancial products sold by outside firms. A few top banks decided to do the same. Many other banks will still do business with Member Works and similar firms.

And banks will still be mining data from your account in order to sell you financial products, including things of little value, such as credit insurance and credit-card protection plans.

You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit. For example, no federal law shields "transaction and experience" information-mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts. Social Security numbers are for sale by private firms. They've generally agreed not to sell to the public. But to businesses, the numbers are an open book. Self- regulation doesn't work. A firm might publish a privacy-protection policy, but who enforces it？

Take U.S. Bancorp again. Customers were told, in writing, that "all personal information you supply to us will be considered confidential." Then it sold your data to Member Works. The bank even claims that it doesn't "sell" your data at all. It merely "shares" it and reaps a profit. Now you know.

Contrary to popular belief, the author finds that spying on people's privacy ______.

A．is mainly carried out by means o{ secret taping

B．has been intensified with the help of the IRS

C．is practiced exclusively by the FBI

D．is more prevalent in business circles

ain named All network servers runWindows Server 2003, and all client computers run Windows XP Professional.You use the Backup utility to schedule a full backup of TESTKINGDC1 everynight. You ensure that the Active Directory configuration is also backed up.One week later, TESTKINGDC1 stops accepting logon requests. On investigation,you discover that the Active Directory configuration is corrupt.You need to restore TESTKINGDC1 as a functioning domain controller.Which two actions should you perform？ （）(Each correct answer presents part of thesolution. Choose two)

A. Restart TESTKINGDC1 in Directory Services Restore Mode.

B. Demote TESTKINGDC1 to a member server.

C. Run the ntbackup systemstate command on TESTKINGDC1.

D. Run the Backup utility and select the option to restore the System State data.

E. Run the ntdsutil command on TESTKINGDC1.

听力原文： The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.

The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15% of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.

But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, Malta does not allow divorce. The proposal would mean that although Maltese nationals could not divorce in Malta, a couple of different EU nationality resident in Malta could apply to the Maltese court for a divorce under their country's laws. Similarly in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly. The Irish government's submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse ... such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."

Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required. "It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonisation of EU family law. The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.

The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which (36) they would come under, based on their (37) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (38) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (39) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different ELI nationalities.

The (40) of member states are said to be (41) the idea and responded positively to a (42) which followed the (43) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15% of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (44) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.

But some member states are expected to resist the (45) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, Malta does not allow divorce. The proposal would mean that although Maltese nationals could not divorce in Malta, a couple of different EU nationality (46) in Malta could apply to the Maltese court for a divorce under their country's laws. Similarly in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (47) a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (48) quickly. The Irish government's

听力原文： The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.

The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15% of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.

But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, Malta does not allow divorce. The proposal would mean that although Maltese nationals could not divorce in Malta, a couple of different EU nationality resident in Malta could apply to the Maltese court for a divorce under their country's laws. Similarly in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly. The Irish government's submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse ... such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."

Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required. "It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonisation of EU family law. The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.

The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which (36) they would come under, based on their (37) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (38) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (39) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different ELI nationalities.

The (40) of member states are said to be (41) the idea and responded positively to a (42) which followed the (43) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15% of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (44) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.

But some member states are expected to resist the (45) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, Malta does not allow divorce. The proposal would mean that although Maltese nationals could not divorce in Malta, a couple of different EU nationality (46) in Malta could apply to the Maltese court for a divorce under their country's laws. Similarly in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (47) a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (48) quickly. The Irish government's

main named testking.com. All domain controllers run Windows Server 2003.A member server named TestKing3 has IIS installed. TestKing3 hosts all content for company web sites. The server is backed up on magnetic tape once each month.To replace the web functionality of TestKing3, the company acquires a new computer. You configure the computer as a member server named TestKing4 and install IIS. You transfer all content from TestKing3 to TestKing4 and start the IIS service on TestKing4.You discover that TestKing4 is not configured with the IIS settings that were defined on TestKing3.You need to ensure that TestKing4 has the same IIS settings that were defined on TestKing3.What should you do？（）

A. Use the most recent backup tape of TestKing3 to restore the System State data on TestKing4.

B. Use the most recent backup tape of TestKing3 to restore C:\windows\system32\inetsrv\History on TestKing4.

C. Use IIS manager on TestKing3 to select the Save Configuration to Disk option. Edit the files to replace system-specific information. Use the edited files to restore the IIS metabase on TestKing4.

D. Use IIS manager on TestKing3 to select the Backup/Restore Configuration option. Edit the files to replace system-specific information. Use the edited files to restore the IIS metabase on TestKing4.

Part A

Directions: Read the following three texts. Answer the questions on each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.

Perhaps it was his own lack of adequate schooling that inspired Horace Mann to work so hard to accomplish the important reforms in education. While he was still a boy, his father died, and he had to support his family. Like most of the children in his town, he attended school two or three months a year. Later, with the help of several teachers, he was able to study law and become a member of the Massachusetts bar, but he never forgot those early struggles.

While serving in the Massachusetts legislature ,he signed a historic education bill that set up a state board of education. Without regret, he gave up his successful legal practice to become the first secretary of the board. There he exercised an enormous influence during the critical period of reconstruction that brought into existence the American graded elementary school as a substitute for the older district school system. Under his leadership, the curriculum was restructured, the school year was increased to a minimum of six months, and mandatory schooling was extended to age sixteen. Other important reforms that came into existence under Mann's guidance included the establishment of state normal schools for teacher training.

Considered quite radical at the time, the Massachusetts reforms later served as a model for the nation's educational system. Mann was formally recognized as the father of public education.

During his lifetime, Horace Mann worked tirelessly to extend educational opportunities to agrarian families and the children of poor laborers. In one of his last speeches he summed up his philosophy of education and life :"Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity."

Which of the following can be the best title of the passage？

A．The Father of American Public Education.

B．Philosophy of Education.

C．Policies of Educational Institutions.

D．Horace Mann and the Massachusetts State Board of Education.

The Basis for Social Order

Man, said Aristotle, is a social animal. This sociability requires peaceful congregation, and the history of mankind is mainly a movement through time of human collectivities that range from migrant tribal bands to large and complex civilizations. Survival has been due to the ability to create the means by which men in groups retain their unity and allegiance to one another.

Order was caused by the need and desire to survive the challenge of the environment. This orderly condition called the "state", and the roles that maintained it, file "law". With time the partner to this tranquility, man marched across the centuries of his evolution to the brink of exploring the boundaries of his own galaxy. Of all living organisms, only man has the capacity to interpret his own evolution as progress. As social life changed, the worth and rights of each member in the larger group, of which he was a part, increased. As the groups grew from clans to civilizations, the value of the individual did not diminish, but became instead a guide to the rules that govern all men.