On seeing the policeman the thief ran off.The moment ____________.

A.seeing a doctor

B.ire

C.Weather

D.Police

A. the thieves ran

B. had the thieves run

C. ran the thieves

D. did the thieves run

A．Because they arrived there too late.

B．Because they can't stand seeing the tragic scene.

C．Because the police didn't allow them to see it.

D．Because they should not destroy the scene.

What was the attitude of the witness during the interview？

A．Obviously somewhat frightened;

B．Excited at seeing the incident.

C．Anxious to give a report to the police station.

D．Calm and unhurried.

g to trap (诱捕)for the past two months. 【B1】 the man they arrested, James Smith, 【B2】 that he was the thief, he was 【B3】 with several diamond rings in his 【B4】 . Police saw Smith 【B5】 a jewelry store on Main Street at 1:16 A.M.. 【B6】 seeing the police, Smith jumped 【B7】 his auto, and a high-speed chase followed for the next fourteen minutes. The police finally 【B8】 Smith off the road and his 【B9】 hit a tree.

When the police searched Smith's 【B10】 , they found the diamond rings 【B11】 in an inside pock et of his jacket. Although Smith claimed that the diamonds were fake(假的), the owner of the jewelry store 【B12】 the most 【B13】 robbery incident happened 【B14】 them 【B15】 his missing jewels.

Smith is now awaiting his first visit to court in a cell in the town jail. If he does not 【B16】 , a jury (陪审团)will have to decide his guilt or innocence. 【B17】 ,a representative of the police stated today that they have no 【B18】 that he will be found to be 【B19】 .This spokesman also stated that they hoped that the alarm 【B20】 in the community by all the recent robberies would be calmed by Smith's arrest.

【B1】

A．When

B．After

C．Until

D．Although

Jewel Thief Captured

At 1:30 this morning, local police finally caught the jewel thief whom they had been trying to trap (诱捕) for the past two months. (51) the man they arrested, James Smith, (52) that he was the thief, he was captured with several diamond rings in his (53) . Po- lice saw Smith leaving a jewelry store on Main Street at 1:16 A, M. . (54) seeing the police, Smith jumped (55) his auto, and a high-speed chase followed for the next fourteen minutes. The police finally (56) Smith off the road and his (57) hit a tree.

When the police searched Smith's (58) , they found the diamond rings hidden in an inside pocket of his jacket. Although Smith claimed that the diamonds were fake (假的), the owner of the jewelry store (59) the most recent robbery incident happened identified them (60) his missing jewels.

Smith is now awaiting his first visit to court in a cell in the town jail. If he does not (61) , a jury (陪审团) will have to decide his guilt or innocence. (62) , a representative of the police stated today that they have no (63) that he will be found to be (64) . This spokesman also stated that they hoped that the alarm (65) in the community by all the recent robberies would be calmed by Smith's arrest.

(51)

A．When

B．After

C．Until

D．Although

ears in prison after a jury wrongly convicted him of raping two women. At Jackson's trial, al though two witnesses testified that Jackson was with them in another location at the times of the crimes, he was convicted anyway. Why？ The jury believed the testimony of the two victims, who positively identified Jackson as the man who had attacked them. The court eventually freed Jackson after the police found the man who had really committed the crimes.

Many factors influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. For instance, witnesses some times see photographs of several suspects before they try to identify the person they saw in a lineup of people. They can become confused by seeing many photographs of similar faces. The number of people in the lineup, and whether it is a live lineup or a photograph, may also affect a witness's decision. People sometimes have difficulty identifying people of other races. The questions the police ask witnesses also have an effect on them.

Many people believe that police officers are more reliable than ordinary people. Psychologists decided to test this idea, and they discovered that it is not true. Two psychologists showed a film of crimes to both police officers and civilians. The psychologists found no difference between the police and the civilians in correctly remembering the details of the crimes.

Despite all the possibilities for inaccuracy, courts cannot exclude eyewitness testimony from a trial. American courts depend almost completely on eyewitness testimony to resolve court cases. Sometimes it is the only evidence to a crime, such as rape. Furthermore, eyewitness testimony is often correct. Although people do sometimes make mistakes, many times they really do identify in dividuals correctly.

American courts depend on the ability of the twelve jurors, and not the judges, to determine the accuracy of the witness' s testimony. It is their responsibility to decide if a certain witness could actually see, hear, and remember what occurred.

In a few cases the testimony of eyewitnesses has convicted innocent people. More importantly, it has rightly convicted a larger number of guilty people; consequently, it continues to be of great value in the American judicial system.

Benard Jackson was found guilty by the jury because______.

A．the victims insisted that he was the attacker

B．the judge believed in the victims' identification

C．the police discovered evidence leading to his guilt

D．the eyewitnesses confirmed the victims' testimony

ears in prison after a jury wrongly convicted him of raping two women. At Jackson's trial, al though two witnesses testified that Jackson was with them in another location at the times of the crimes, he was convicted anyway. Why？ The jury believed the testimony of the two victims, who positively identified Jackson as the man who had attacked them. The court eventually freed Jackson after the police found the man who had really committed the crimes.

Many factors influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. For instance, witnesses some times see photographs of several suspects before they try to identify the person they saw in a lineup of people. They can become confused by seeing many photographs of similar faces. The number of people in the lineup, and whether it is a live lineup or a photograph, may also affect a witness's decision. People sometimes have difficulty identifying people of other races. The questions the police ask witnesses also have an effect on them.

Many people believe that police officers are more reliable than ordinary people. Psychologists decided to test this idea, and they discovered that it is not true. Two psychologists showed a film of crimes to both police officers and civilians. The psychologists found no difference between the police and the civilians in correctly remembering the details of the crimes.

Despite all the possibilities for inaccuracy, courts cannot exclude eyewitness testimony from a trial. American courts depend almost completely on eyewitness testimony to resolve court cases. Sometimes it is the only evidence to a crime, such as rape. Furthermore, eyewitness testimony is often correct. Although people do sometimes make mistakes, many times they really do identify in dividuals correctly.

American courts depend on the ability of the twelve jurors, and not the judges, to determine the accuracy of the witness' s testimony. It is their responsibility to decide if a certain witness could actually see, hear, and remember what occurred.

In a few cases the testimony of eyewitnesses has convicted innocent people. More importantly, it has rightly convicted a larger number of guilty people; consequently, it continues to be of great value in the American judicial system.

Benard Jackson was found guilty by the jury because______.

A．the victims insisted that he was the attacker

B．the judge believed in the victims' identification

C．the police discovered evidence leading to his guilt

D．the eyewitnesses confirmed the victims' testimony

Text 3

Bernard Jackson is a free man today, but he has many bitter memories. Jackson spent five years in prison after a jury wrongly convicted him of raping two women. At Jackson' s trial, although two witnesses testified that Jackson was with them in another location at the times of thcrimes, he was convicted anyway. Why？ The jury believed the testimony of the two victims, who positively identified Jackson as the man who had attacked them. The court eventually freed Jackson after the police found the man who had really committed the crimes.

Many factors influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. For instance, witnesses some-times see photographs of several suspects before they try to identify the person they saw in a lineup of people. They can become confused by seeing many photographs of similar faces. The number of people in the lineup, and whether it is a live lineup or a photograph, may also affect a witness' s decision. People sometimes have difficulty identifying people of other races. The questions the po-lice ask witnesses also have an effect on them.

Many people believe that police officers are more reliable than ordinary people. Psychologists decided to test this idea, and they discovered that it is not true. Two psychologists showed a film of crimes to both police officers and civilians. The psychologists found no difference between the police and the civilians in correctly remembering the details of the crimes. .

Despite all the possibilities for inaccuracy, courts cannot exclude eyewitness testimony from a trial. American courts depend almost completely on eyewitness testimony to resolve court cases. Sometimes it is the only evidence to a crime, such as rape. Furthermore, eyewitness testimony is often correct. Although people do sometimes make mistakes, many times they really do identify in dividuals correctly.

American courts depend on the ability of the twelve jurors, and not the judges, to determine the accuracy of the witness' s testimony. It is their responsibility to decide if a certain witness could actually see, hear, and remember what occurred.

In a few cases the testimony of eyewitnesses has convicted innocent people. More important ly,it has rightly convicted a larger number of guilty people; consequently, it continues to be of great value in the American judicial system.

56. Benard Jackson was found guilty by the jury because_________ .

[A] the victims insisted that he was the attacker

[ B] the judge believed in the victims' identification

[ C] the police discovered evidence leading to his guilt

[D] the eyewinesses confirmed the victims' testimony

fast and do not make mistakes. Many banks put advertisements in the newspaper showing that their business deals are "untouched by human hands" and therefore safe from human temptation. Obviously, computers have no reason to steal money. But the growing number of computer crimes shows they can be used to steal. Computer criminals don't use guns. And even if they are caught, it is hard to punish them because there are no witnesses and often no evidences. A computer cannot remember who used it; it simply does what it is told. One clerk at a New York City bank used a computer to steal more than one and a half million dollars in just four years. No one noticed this because he moved money from one account to another. Each time a customer he had robbed questioned the balance in his account, the clerk claimed a computer error, then replaced the missing money from someone else's account. This clerk was caught only because he was gambling. When the police broke up an illegal gambling operation, his name was put in the records. Most computer criminals have been minor employees. But police wonder if this is true. As one official say, "I have a feeling that there is more crime out there than we are catching. What we are seeing now is all so poorly done. I wonder what the real experts are doing--the ones who really know how a computer works."

(30)

A．Computers are fast.

B．Computers do not often provide evidences or witnesses.

C．Computers can replace paperwork.

D．Computers are safe from human temptation.

hool. 2My mother and I heard the terrifying sound of squealing brakes. 3In a low voice, she said, Oh, my God—Blackie. 4I remember trailing her out the door and seeing a car fill with teenagers and a spreading pool of bright blood on our cobblestoned street. 5To me, it seemed only a matter of seconds until a police car pulled up. 6The officer glanced at the crumpled dog under the car. 7And drew his gun. 8My mother shouted, "No!" 9She crawled halfway under the car and took the dog, like a sack of flour, out from under the wheels, 10Her housedress was splashed with blood, she cradled the limp dog in her arms and ordered the officers to drive her to the vets office, 11It was only then that she remembered me, I think. 12She patted my head, was telling me to walk up to school, and reassured me that Blackie would be all right. 13The rest of the story including Blackie's slow recovery and few more years of life, are fuzzy and vague now. 14But the sights and sounds of those few moments are as vivid to me now as they were twenty-five years ago.