The motivation of a student who wishes integrate with the L2 culture is what？（）

The main message the author wishes to convey in the text is that.

A．the issue of environmental governance is both complex and important

B．environmental governance is a new issue on the horizon

C．globalization is affecting the entire world

D．in response to globalization, there are issues we need to deal with

Among the most enduring of all horrors is the prospect of a slow, painful death. Those who witness the protracted terminal illness of a friend or relative often view the eventual death more as a relief than a tragedy.

But to make life or death decisions on behalf of a dying person unable to communicate his or her wishes is to enter a moral and legal minefield. Could a doctor be sued for withholding treatment and allowing someone to die — or for not allowing him or her to die? Could it ever be lawful to withhold food and water?

Legal moves are afoot which may settle these questions. Recently, a group on voluntary euthanasia proposed legislation to make documents known as "Advance Directives", or Living Wills, legally binding.

An Advance Directive sets out the kind of medical treatment a person wishes to receive, or not receive, should he or she ever be in a condition that prevents them expressing those wishes. Such documents, much in vogue in the US and some EU countries, are becoming increasingly popular in Britain.

A clear distinction must be drawn between actions requested by an Advance Directive, and active euthanasia, or "mercy killing". A doctor who took a positive step — such as giving a lethal injection — to help a patient die would, as the law stands, be guilty of murder or aiding and abetting suicide, depending On the circumstances.

An Advance Directive, however, requests only passive euthanasia: the withholding of medical treatment aimed solely at sustaining the life of a patient who is terminally ill or a vegetable (in a vegetative state). The definition of medical treatment, in such circumstances, Can include food and water.

The enforceability of the Advance Directive Stems from the notion, long accepted in English law, that a person who is both old enough to make an informed decision and compos mentis, is entitled to refuse any medical treatment offered by a doctor, even if that refusal leads to the person's death. A doctor who forces treatment on a patient against his or her wishes is, therefore, guilty of an assault. Case law exists in the US and several EU countries that extends this right of autonomy over one's life to patients who write an Advance Directive refusing treatment and subsequently lose their reason. There is no reason, based on public policy or English case law, why an English court should treat previously made instructions any differently.

It will be a relief over the death of a friend or a relative if the friend or relative dies from ______.

A．a traffic accident

B．an acute infectious disease

C．heart attack

D．a three-year cancer

Among the most enduring of all horrors is the prospect of a slow, painful death. Those who witness the protracted terminal illness of a friend or relative often view the eventual death more as a relief than a tragedy.

But to make life or death decisions on behalf of a dying person unable to communicate his or her wishes is to enter a moral and legal minefield. Could a doctor be sued for withholding treatment and allowing someone to die — or for not allowing him or her to die? Could it ever be lawful to withhold food and water?

Legal moves are afoot which may settle these questions. Recently, a group on voluntary euthanasia pro- posed legislation to make documents known as "Advance Directives", or Living Wills, legally binding.

An Advance Directive sets out the kind of medical treatment a person wishes to receive, or not receive, should he or she ever be in a condition that prevents them expressing those wishes. Such documents, much in vogue in the US and some EU countries, are becoming increasingly popular in Britain.

A clear distinction must be drawn between actions requested by an Advance Directive, and active euthanasia, or "mercy killing". A doctor who took a positive step — such as giving a lethal injection — to help a patient die would, as the law stands, be guilty of murder or aiding and abetting suicide, depending On the circum- stances.

An Advance Directive, however, requests only passive euthanasia: the withholding of medical treatment aimed solely at sustaining the life of a patient who is terminally ill or a vegetable (in a vegetative state). The definition of medical treatment, in such circumstances, Can include food and water.

The enforceability of the Advance Directive Stems from the notion, long accepted in English law, that a person who is both old enough to make an informed decision and compos mentis, is entitled to refuse any medical treatment offered by a doctor, even if that refusal leads to the person's death. A doctor who forces treatment on a patient against his or her wishes is, therefore, guilty of an assault. Case law exists in the US and several EU countries that extends this right of autonomy over one's life to patients who write an Advance Directive refusing treatment and subsequently lose their reason. There is no reason, based on public policy or English case law, why an English court should treat previously made instructions any differently.

It will be a relief over the death of a friend or a relative if the friend or relative dies from ______.

A．a traffic accident

B．an acute infectious disease

C．heart attack

D．a three-year cancer

Among the most enduring of all horrors is the prospect of a slow, painful death. Those who witness the protracted terminal illness of a friend or relative often view the eventual death more as a relief than a tragedy.

But to make life-or-death decisions on behalf of a dying person unable to communicate his or her wishes is to enter a moral and legal minefield. Could a doctor be sued for withholding treatment and allowing someone to dieor for not allowing him or her to die? Could it ever be lawful to withhold food and water?

Legal moves are afoot which may settle these questions. Recently, a group on voluntary euthanasia proposed legislation to make documents known as "Advance Directives", or Living Wills, legally binding.

An Advance Directive sets out the kind of medical treatment a person wishes to receive, or not receive, should he or she ever be in a condition that prevents them expressing those wishes. Such documents, much in vogue in the US and some Commonwealth countries, are becoming increasingly popular in Britain.

A clear distinction must be drawn between actions requested by an Advance Directive, and active euthanasia, or "mercy killing". A doctor who took a positive step such as giving a lethal injection-to help a patient die would, as the law stands, be guilty of murder or aiding and abetting suicide, depending on the circumstances.

An Advance Directive, however, requests only passive euthanasia: the withholding of medical treatment aimed solely at sustaining the life of a patient who is terminally ill or a vegetable. The definition of medical treatment, in such circumstances, can include food and water. The enforceability of the Advance Directive stems from the notion, long accepted in English law, that a person who is both old enough to make an informed decision and compos mentis, is entitled to refuse any medical treatment offered by a doctor, even if that refusal leads to the person's death. A doctor who forces treatment on a patient against his or her wishes is, therefore, guilty of an assault. Case law exists in the US and several Commonwealth countries that extends this right of autonomy over one's life to patients who write an Advance Directive refusing treatment and subsequently lose their previously made instructions any differently.

It will be a relief over the death of a friend or a relative if the friend or relative dies from ______.

A．a traffic accident

B．an acute infectious disease

C．heart attack

D．a three-year coma (昏迷)

The Master of a vessel berthed，moored or anchored within the area of jurisdiction and who wishes to move his vessel to another berth，mooring or anchorage within that area ______ from‘Bahrain Port Control’prior to moving．

A.shall not request permission

B.shall request permission

C.shall，if in convenience，request permission

D.shall send his permission to the Harbour Master

Revise each of the following sentences according to the requirement given in the brackets.

15. In accordance with your wishes , we are sending you under separate cover two contract forms. (to make it concise)

16. The committee reached the conclusion that a great majority of students had a preference for mail-in registration. (to improve the vigor and clarity)

17. Reference is made to your May 7 letter in which you describe the approved procedure for initiating a claim. (to make it conversational)

18. You won' t be disappointed with the many electronic services we now offer. (to make it positive)

19. It is imperative that you reply at once. (to make it courteous)

20. This letter is to inform. you of an important change in our policy concerning insurance. (to emphasize "you" attitude)

21. Every employee is entitled to see his personnel file. (to eliminate gender bias)

22. According to you , the it stopped working. (to avoid mistrust)

23. You must return the form. by 5 p. m. (to change the aggressive tone to a friendly one)

24. We will inspect the building plans before construction begins. (to avoid dangerous words)

阅读下面的句子，根据文章内容进行判断，正确写(T)错误写(F)

Headhunters or executive search firms specialize in finding the right person for the right job. When a company wishes to recruit a new person for an important position, it may use the services of such a firm. The advantages for the employer are that it does not have to organize the costly and time-consuming process of advertising, selecting and interviewing suitable applicant. In some cases, the search firm may already have a list of people with the appropriate skills for the job. If this is not the case, then it may act as a consultant, advising or even organizing tests and simulations to evaluate candidates' behavior. in order to select the most competent person for the job.

()21. The passage mainly talks about the increased business of headhunters.

()22. Companies may use the services of an executive search firm to recruit new employees.

()23. Employers prefer to use the headhunters because the services are cheap.

()24. Search firms often have their own talent pool or human resource ban

()25. Headhunters also provide services like advertisement and candidate evaluation.

You have read the following advertisement in a magazine.

You have a close friend who wishes to participate in this project and you feel he or she would be very suitable. Please write a recommendation to the magazine.

You should write no fewer than 106 words on the Answer Sheet.

People today are still talking about the generation gap. Some parents complain that their children do not show them proper respect, while children complain that their parents do not understand them at all.

What has gone wrong? Why has the generation gap appeared?

One important cause is that young people want to choose their own life style. In more traditional societies, when children grow up, they are expected to live in the same area as their parents, to marry people on their children are another cause of the generation gap.

Parents often expect their children to do better than they do, to find better jobs, to make more money; the high wishes that parents place on their children are another cause of the generation gap.

Finally, the high speed of social changes deepens the gap. In a traditional culture, people are valued for their wisdom, but in our society today the knowledge of a lifetime may be out of use overnight.

According to the passage, children today expect their parents to ______.

A．give them more independence

B．choose a good job for them

C．live together with them

D．make more money