It was inevitable that this primacy should have narrowed as other countries grew richer. Just as inevitably, the retreat from predominance proved painful. By the mid-1980s Americans had found themselves at a loss over their fading industrial competitiveness. Some huge American industries, such as consumer electronics, had shrunk or vanished in the face of foreign competition. By 1987 there was only one American television maker left, Zenith. (Now there is none: Zenith was bought by South Korea's LG Electronics. ) Foreign-made cars and textiles were sweeping into the domestic market. America's machine-tool industry was on the ropes. For a while it looked as though the making of semiconductors, which America had sat at the heart of the new computer age, was going to be the next casualty.
All of this caused a crisis of confidence. Americans stopped taking prosperity for granted. They began to believe that their way of doing business was failing, and that their incomes would therefore shortly begin to fail as well. The mid-1980s brought one inquiry after another into the causes of America's industrial decline. Their sometimes sensational findings were filled with warnings about the growing competition from overseas.
How things have changed! In 1995 the United States can look back on five years of solid growth while Japan has been straggling. Few Americans attribute this solely to such obvious causes as a devalued dollar or the turning of the business cycle. Self-doubt has yielded to blind pride. "American industry has changed its structure, has gone on a diet, has learnt to be more quick-witted," according to Richard Cavanagh, executive dean of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government. "It makes me proud to be an American just to see how our businesses are improving their productivity," says Stephen Moore of the Cato Institute, a think-tank in Washington, D. C. And William Sahlman of the Harvard Business School believes, that people will look back on this period as "a golden age of business management in the United States".
Which of the following statements is TRUE about US economic predominance after World War Ⅱ?
A.The unparalleled size of its workforce had given an impetus to its economy.
B.The war had destroyed the economies of most potential competitors.
C.Its domestic market was eight times larger than before.
D.It had made painstaking efforts towards this goal.
第1题
要求:
(1)编制20×4年1月1 日取得借款的会计分录;
(2)编制20×4年、20×5年和20×6年计算确定利息费用和应付未付利息的会计分录;
(3)编制20×6年12月31日偿还本金并支付最后一期利息的会计分录。
(“长期借款”科目须写出明细科目)
第2题
要求:(1)根据上述资料计算2007年利息资本化的金额,并编制2007年年末计提借款利息的会计分录。
(2)根据上述资料计算2008年利息资本化的金额,并编制2008年年末计提借款利息的会计分录。
第3题
要求:根据上述业务编制有关会计分录。
第4题
某企业2007年发生下列经济业务:
(1)1月1日向银行借入800000元,期限三年,年利率6%,合同规定到期一次还本付息。该企业每半年计算利息费用借入款项用于建造甲生产线。
(2)1月20日,从某公司购入甲生产线设备 700000元,价款以银行存款支付。
(3)1月30日,以银行存款支付工程劳务费用 200000元。
(4)6月30日,计提该借款利息。
(5)经批准于7月1日发行每张面值100元,票面利率为12%期限5年的债券10000张,实收发行债券款1000000元。借入的款项用于建造乙厂房。
(6)计提长期借款利息和发行债券利息,到 12月31日乙厂房建造尚未开工,计提发行债券利息费用计入当期损益。
(7)12月31日,生产线建造完工,并周转建造成本。
要求:编制2006年上述业务有关的会计分录。
第5题
A.1月1日
B.2月1日
C.3月1日
D.4月1日
第6题
要求:根据上述业务编制有关会计分录。
第7题
<?xml:namespace prefix="st1" ns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags">?xml:namespace>
B.3
C.4.5
D.7.5
第8题
<?xml:namespace prefix="st1" ns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags">?xml:namespace>
B.3
C.4.5
D.7.5
第9题
A.1.5
B.3
C.4.5
D.7.5
第10题
A.1.5
B.3
C.4.5
D.7.5
为了保护您的账号安全,请在“上学吧”公众号进行验证,点击“官网服务”-“账号验证”后输入验证码“”完成验证,验证成功后方可继续查看答案!